- Why did the author think the U of Chicago test revealed that he was racist? Is he right?
The author thought the U of Chicago test revealed that he was racist because he shot at the black gunmen a few seconds faster than when shooting at the white gunmen during the test. I’m not sure you could consider anyone or yourself racist just from a test like that. I think the author may be right in some respects, but I think being racist encompasses how you act toward other races and your attidtude toward them on a day-to-day basis more than basing the decision off an on-line game.
2. Do these tests measure “unconscious” racism? Why do you think so?
I agree that these tests measure unconcious racism because in the back of your head your probably always identifying people that are of a different race than you, and to automatically shoot at someone faster who’s of a different race, than automatically shooting at someone faster who’s of your own race does measure unconcious or subconcious racism to a degree.
3. Why does the author think that sexism may be harder to fight than racism? What research suggests this?
The author thinks that sexism may be harder to fight than racism because in certain tests conducted like putting all blacks and whites who are males and females in jerseys and having people look at photos of them, people usually remembered what gender the people were in the photograph more than what race they were. Also, women are misconccepted as friendly and warm usually, and a women who is tougher is viewed as colder. When people people think these thoughts about women, we are stereotyping women and being unconciously sexist toward them. We catagorize males or females especially, with thoughts and feelings toward them that may be viewing them in an untrue way; making gender differences harder to overcome.
4. Paraphrase this quote: The challenge for women competing in politics or business is less misogyny than unconscious sexism: Americans don’t hate women, but they do frequently stereotype them as warm and friendly, creating a mismatch with the stereotype we hold of leaders as tough and strong.
Americans don’t dislike women but we do stereotype them as people who aren’t as strong of leaders as men are, because of the way we view them to be (warm and friendly). We associate being a leader with having a stonger and tougher outlook, opposite of what be regard women to be, therefore women in politics face more of a challenge to succeed in that field, than men do.
5. What is the real problem women face according to the author? What do you think?
The real problem women face according to the author is being viewed as both a nice caring person and as being competent at the same time. I think that is true also. It’s sort of like a women is either not as smart as a man but is still nice, or the women is competent but is not a very nice person.
6. How can this problem be confronted according to the author? What do you think?
The author thinks this problem can be confronted is we open our minds to what women are really like, not just in a national viewpoint but them as a person too, and if we forget about the biases that unconciously exist in our minds.